Greenhouse only knows its half.
Greenhouse tracks ats, but can't see track status. So what you read there is already partial.
The data for your hiring decision already exists in Ashby / Greenhouse. The problem is no one view joins it. Offer timelines depend on check completion.
Today they don't, so the hiring decision guesses.
Greenhouse tracks ats, but can't see track status. So what you read there is already partial.
Track status from Ashby sits in its own tab while Greenhouse carries ats. Nobody joins them.
Ashby sees verify completion shift before anyone, yet the hiring decision owner hears about it last.
Under The Hood
ATS
Background Check Providers (Checkr, Sterling)
One worklist: Initiate checks, track status, verify completion, flag issues, update records. Ranked by priority, top risks flagged, a next step on each.
The Context Store
Ashby / Greenhouse get reconciled up front for background check: ATS, Background Check Providers (Checkr, Sterling), HRIS, Compliance Systems mapped to a single role view instead of 2 separate APIs.
Your agent queries one surface instead of three APIs. Faster responses, lower cost per query, and results that work because the relationships were built before you asked the question.
The Prompt
Two steps. Your data, your results, under 60 seconds.
Run my hiring decision: pull ATS, Background Check Providers (Checkr, Sterling), HRIS, Compliance Systems from Greenhouse and Ashby and summarize.
SETUP
Use the Airbyte Agent MCP. 2+ connected sources behind one natural-language surface.
WORKFLOW
check connectors, connect Greenhouse and Ashby, query ATS, Background Check Providers (Checkr, Sterling), HRIS, Compliance Systems, reconcile per role, summarize. Missing tools tell you how to link them. A one-time browser auth.
TASK
Initiate checks, track status, verify completion, flag issues, update records and surface the worklist: highest-risk roles first, each with a recommended next step.The Outcome
10x
10x speed: background check turns a 2-hour hiring decision into under a minute.
90%
90% less spend: no glue code; it runs on your existing 2-tool stack to initiate checks.
2 -> 1
2 -> 1: background check answers Greenhouse and Ashby in a single query.
Based on internal benchmarks comparing Context Store queries to sequential API calls across equivalent datasets.
01 · Output
A 1-10 score on each role means the urgent ATS rises to the top of background check on its own.
02 · Signal
Any conflict between Greenhouse and your applicant tracker on ATS is raised for review rather than silently smoothed over.
03 · Context
Each line carries its evidence. Track status pulled from Ashby. Right where you read it.
04 · Action
Every row ends in a move: background check tells you what to change and who owns it.
05 · Brief
The worklist arrives meeting-ready: ATS first, sources attached, Greenhouse and Ashby reconciled.
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Manual distribution wastes time. Yet the inputs sit split across Stripe + Shopify + Salesforce.
Search talent databases shouldn't take a morning of tab-switching across Salesforce, Greenhouse, and LinkedIn Ads. Passive candidates don't apply to postings.
Right now the hiring decision means stitching Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Linear by hand. Strategic workforce planning requires integrated data, so the work lands late and half-blind.

Didn't find your answer? Please don't hesitate to reach out.
How do I trust the hiring decision?
Is ATS stored anywhere by Background Check?
What if a role shows up in two of Greenhouse and Ashby?
Does Background Check replace Greenhouse?
Wire Greenhouse and Ashby and 47+ sources into Airbyte's Agent MCP and build background check on data you already own.