GitHub only knows its half.
GitHub tracks github (commits, prs, reviews), but can't see tickets. So what you read there is already partial.
Build an Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder Agent withGitHub, Jira, and Notion
Aggregates an engineer's contributions across code shouldn't take a morning of tab-switching across Notion, GitHub, and Jira. Performance reviews require quantifying months of contributions across multiple systems; tedious data gathering that engineers dread.
Aggregates an engineer's contributions across code needs 3 systems to agree.
Today they don't, so the incident review guesses.
Today they don't, so the incident review guesses.
Jira holds what GitHub misses.
Tickets lives in Jira, cut off from github (commits, prs, reviews), so engineering self-evaluation builder guesses at the link.
Notion knows before you do.
Documentation lands in Notion hours early. Too far from GitHub to change the incident review in time.
Under The Hood
Three sources, one query: engineering self-evaluation builder pulls GitHub, Jira, and Notion pre-wired. Already connected.
01
Check aggregates an engineer's contributions across code from GitHub (engineering stack)
GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews)
02
Check tickets from Jira (project tracker)
Jira (tickets completed)
03
Fetch documentation from Notion (docs hub)
Confluence (docs authored)
output
Agent-ready output
The rundown for the incident review: Aggregates an engineer's contributions across code, tickets, documentation, and reviews for performance reviews, riskiest items surfaced and owned.
The Context Store
GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews) from Notion, GitHub, and Jira, pre-joined before the agent runs.
Before the prompt runs, the Context Store has matched GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews), Jira (tickets completed), Confluence (docs authored), calendar (meetings facilitated) from Notion, GitHub, and Jira and 1 more onto one incident record. Engineering self-evaluation builder just reads it, no ID-stitching.
Your agent queries one surface instead of three APIs. Faster responses, lower cost per query, and results that work because the relationships were built before you asked the question.
INCIDENT-LEVEL JOINSENGINEERING SCHEMANO GLUE CODE
The Prompt
Copy. Paste.
an Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder Agent
Two steps. Your data, your results, under 60 seconds.
01install
Connect the Airbyte Agent MCP02copy and run
Help me turn GitHub, Jira, and Notion into a single incident review I can act on.
SETUP
The Airbyte Agent MCP exposes 4+ of your tools as one queryable layer.
WORKFLOW
connect GitHub, Jira, and Notion -> read GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews), Jira (tickets completed), Confluence (docs authored), calendar (meetings facilitated) -> merge into one incident view -> rank and explain. Each unconnected source is a one-off connect step away.
TASK
Aggregates an engineer's contributions across code, tickets, documentation, and reviews for performance reviews. Return one rundown ranked by urgency, top risks called out, a next step on each.The Outcome
Aggregates an engineer's contributions across code on demand: 2 hours of effort, ~60 seconds of agent.
10x
Faster
~10x. Engineering self-evaluation builder drops from a 2-hour chore to one query.
90%
Cheaper to run
~90% cheaper: Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder reuses the 4 connectors you already pay for.
3 -> 1
Tools, one query
3 sources, 1 prompt: GitHub, Jira, and Notion reconciled before engineering self-evaluation builder runs.
Based on internal benchmarks comparing Context Store queries to sequential API calls across equivalent datasets.
01 · Output
Priority scoring
Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder ranks each incident by risk, not by name. The top of the list is where to start.
02 · Signal
Reality-check flags
Any conflict between your engineering stack and Jira on GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews) is raised for review rather than silently smoothed over.
03 · Context
Inline evidence
Tickets from Jira and Notion sits beside each item, letting you aggregates an engineer's contributions across code without switching tabs.
04 · Action
Tells you what to do
Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder closes each incident with a recommendation. The owner and the move. Ready to run.
05 · Brief
Rundown-ready
The rundown arrives meeting-ready: GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews) first, sources attached, GitHub, Jira, and Notion reconciled.
After Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder: more engineering agents to build
view All use casesEngineering PR Reviewer
Engineering teams run incident reviews on stale, scattered data: GitHub / Jira / Notion each hold a piece, none hold the whole. Code review quality depends on context beyond the diff; what's the broader project goal? What patterns does this codebase follow? What did the related ticket specify? This means joining GitHub data with Jira data with Confluence specs, each with different API patterns and rate limits.
In-App Support to Engineering Pipeline Agent
The data for your incident review already exists in Jira / Intercom / GitHub. The problem is no one view joins it. Bug reports in support take days to reach engineering.
Engineering Onboarding Guide
Engineering teams run incident reviews on stale, scattered data: Jira / Intercom / GitHub each hold a piece, none hold the whole. New engineers waste 2-3 weeks rambling through disconnected docs.
Common questions
Didn't find your answer? Please don't hesitate to reach out.
What if a incident shows up in two of GitHub, Jira, and Notion?
The shared key de-dupes it. Engineering self-evaluation builder keeps one incident with GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews) merged across sources.
Can I tweak what Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder returns?
Edit the TASK line. Change the ranking, the rundown format, or which of GitHub, Jira, and Notion it leans on.
Is GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews) stored anywhere by Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder?
No, engineering self-evaluation builder reads GitHub (commits, PRs, reviews), Jira (tickets completed), Confluence (docs authored), calendar (meetings facilitated) live through the connectors and returns the rundown; nothing persists outside GitHub, Jira, and Notion.
What does Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder cost to run?
It rides the 4 connectors you already license. No seats, no glue code, no infra to aggregates an engineer's contributions across code.
Engineering Self-Evaluation Builder is one prompt away from Notion, GitHub, and Jira.
Wire GitHub, Jira, and Notion and 49+ sources into the Airbyte Agent MCP and build engineering self-evaluation builder on data you already own.
