Greenhouse only knows its half.
Greenhouse tracks applications, but can't see interviews. So what you read there is already partial.
Right now the hiring decision means stitching Greenhouse / Gmail / Ashby by hand. Candidate experience portals show application status, so the work lands late and half-blind.
The hiring decision eats the gap.
Greenhouse tracks applications, but can't see interviews. So what you read there is already partial.
Interviews lives in Gmail, cut off from applications, so candidate journey for candidates guesses at the link.
By the time stages in Ashby reaches the hiring decision, the window to act has usually shut.
Under The Hood
Applications
interviews
stages
One digest: Show candidate journeys (interview stages) in your application. Ranked by priority, top risks flagged, a next step on each.
The Context Store
To show candidate journeys (interview stages) in your application, the Context Store pre-joins applications, interviews, stages, feedback across Greenhouse / Gmail / Ashby and 1 more on the candidate key. One query, one truth.
Your agent queries one surface instead of three APIs. Faster responses, lower cost per query, and results that work because the relationships were built before you asked the question.
The Prompt
Two steps. Your data, your results, under 60 seconds.
Run my hiring decision: pull applications, interviews, stages, feedback from Greenhouse, Gmail, and Ashby and summarize.
SETUP
You have Airbyte's Agent MCP, wiring up 4+ tools you can query in plain language.
WORKFLOW
list connectors -> link Greenhouse, Gmail, and Ashby -> pull applications, interviews, stages, feedback -> join on the candidate key -> analyze. An unlinked tool returns a self-describing prompt; a one-time browser auth and retry.
TASK
Show candidate journeys (interview stages) in your application and surface the digest: highest-risk candidates first, each with a recommended next step.The Outcome
10x
10x faster. Candidate journey for candidates does in seconds what ate 2 hours of show candidate journeys (interview stages) in your application.
90%
90% off the build cost: 4 sources already licensed, nothing extra to show candidate journeys (interview stages) in your application.
3 -> 1
3 sources, 1 prompt: Greenhouse, Gmail, and Ashby reconciled before candidate journey for candidates runs.
Based on internal benchmarks comparing Context Store queries to sequential API calls across equivalent datasets.
01 · Output
Every candidate scored 1-10, so candidate journey for candidates surfaces what needs you first instead of an alphabetized list.
02 · Signal
Greenhouse vs Gmail mismatches on show candidate journeys (interview stages) in your application get called out so you decide, not the math.
03 · Context
The hiring decision shows the supporting applications inline, sourced from Gmail and Ashby, no digging required.
04 · Action
Candidate journey for candidates closes each candidate with a recommendation. The owner and the move. Ready to run.
05 · Brief
The digest arrives meeting-ready: applications first, sources attached, Greenhouse, Gmail, and Ashby reconciled.
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Job boards display complete job details. Yet the inputs sit split across Ashby and Greenhouse.
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Recruiting analytics; identify pipeline bottlenecks. Yet the inputs sit split across Salesforce / Greenhouse / HubSpot.
The data for your hiring decision already exists in Ashby + Greenhouse. The problem is no one view joins it. Job boards aggregate open positions.
Didn't find your answer? Please don't hesitate to reach out.
How do I build a candidate journey for candidates agent with Greenhouse, Gmail, and Ashby?
Is applications stored anywhere by Candidate journey for candidates?
How long until Candidate journey for candidates is live?
Does Candidate journey for candidates replace Greenhouse?
Wire Greenhouse, Gmail, and Ashby and 49+ sources into the Agent MCP and build candidate journey for candidates on data you already own.