Greenhouse only knows its half.
Greenhouse tracks hris, but can't see analyze workforce data. So what you read there is already partial.
Build a Headcount Planning Agent withGreenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Budget planning requires current headcount data synced with financial systems. Yet the inputs sit split across Ashby / Greenhouse / Amplitude.
Three tools, three tabs, and nothing reconciles HRIS.
Now your agent can fix it.
Now your agent can fix it.
Amplitude tells a different story.
What Amplitude knows about analyze workforce data rarely flows back to Greenhouse. Two tools, one unreconciled gap.
The signal hits Ashby first.
Ashby sees predict turnover shift before anyone, yet the hiring decision owner hears about it last.
Under The Hood
One prompt to forecast hiring needs. Three sources, already connected. Already connected.
01
Pull forecast hiring needs from Greenhouse (applicant tracker)
HRIS
02
Pull analyze workforce data from Amplitude (product analytics)
Payroll Systems
03
Query predict turnover from Ashby (applicant tracker)
ATS
output
Agent-ready output
Forecast hiring needs, analyze workforce data, predict turnover, optimize team composition, returned as one plan headcount planning ranks for you.
The Context Store
To forecast hiring needs, the agent reads one joined view. Not 4 raw APIs.
Before the prompt runs, the Context Store has matched HRIS, Payroll Systems, ATS, Performance Management, Financial Planning Systems from Ashby / Greenhouse / Amplitude and 1 more onto one role record. Headcount planning just reads it, no ID-stitching.
Your agent queries one surface instead of three APIs. Faster responses, lower cost per query, and results that work because the relationships were built before you asked the question.
SHARED KEY4 SOURCESONE VIEWLIVE READS
The Prompt
Copy. Paste.
a Headcount Planning Agent
Two steps. Your data, your results, under 60 seconds.
01install
Connect the Airbyte Agent MCP02copy and run
Run my hiring decision: pull HRIS, Payroll Systems, ATS, Performance Management, Financial Planning Systems from Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby and summarize.
SETUP
Airbyte's MCP exposes 4+ of your tools as one queryable layer.
WORKFLOW
connect Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby -> read HRIS, Payroll Systems, ATS, Performance Management, Financial Planning Systems -> merge into one role view -> rank and explain. Each unconnected source is a one-off connect step away.
TASK
Forecast hiring needs, analyze workforce data, predict turnover, optimize team composition. Return one plan ranked by urgency, top risks called out, a next step on each.The Outcome
Forecast hiring needs drops from 2 hours to under a minute. Now your agent can fix it.
10x
Faster
10x. 2 hours to forecast hiring needs becomes one run of headcount planning.
90%
Cheaper to run
~90% cheaper: Headcount Planning reuses the 4 connectors you already pay for.
3 -> 1
Tools, one query
3 sources, 1 prompt: Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby reconciled before headcount planning runs.
Based on internal benchmarks comparing Context Store queries to sequential API calls across equivalent datasets.
01 · Output
Priority scoring
A 1-10 score on each role means the urgent HRIS rises to the top of headcount planning on its own.
02 · Signal
Mismatch alerts
When your product analytics and your applicant tracker disagree on forecast hiring needs, the gap is flagged. Not averaged into a guess.
03 · Context
Context overlay
The hiring decision shows the supporting HRIS inline, sourced from Amplitude and Ashby, no digging required.
04 · Action
Tells you what to do
Every row ends in a move: headcount planning tells you the owner and the move.
05 · Brief
Plan-ready
The plan arrives meeting-ready: HRIS first, sources attached, Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby reconciled.
Other people ops agents on the same connectors
view All use casesBackground Check Agent
The data for your hiring decision already exists in Ashby / Greenhouse. The problem is no one view joins it. Offer timelines depend on check completion.
Employee Training Agent
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Compliance training has strict deadlines. Yet the inputs sit split across Sentry + Incident.io.
Candidate Screening Agent
People ops teams run hiring decisions on stale, scattered data: Ashby and Greenhouse each hold a piece, none hold the whole. Manual screening takes 20+ minutes per resume.
Common questions
Didn't find your answer? Please don't hesitate to reach out.
How fresh is the role data Headcount Planning uses?
Live, it reads Greenhouse at query time, so the plan shows HRIS as of now, not last night.
How long until Headcount Planning is live?
Minutes. Each connector is a one-off connect step, then headcount planning runs on demand or on a schedule.
Can I tweak what Headcount Planning returns?
Edit the TASK line. Change the ranking, the plan format, or which of Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby it leans on.
How do I trust the hiring decision?
Headcount Planning cites a source per line. HRIS from Greenhouse, the rest from Amplitude and Ashby. So any figure traces back.
Headcount Planning is one prompt away from Ashby / Greenhouse / Amplitude.
Connect Greenhouse, Amplitude, and Ashby (plus 49+ more) and ship headcount planning today to forecast hiring needs.
