GitHub only knows its half.
GitHub tracks code repositories (github, gitlab), but can't see identify issues. So what you read there is already partial.
Build a GitHub PR Review Agent withGitHub and Gitlab
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Manual PR review bottlenecks development. Yet the inputs sit split across GitHub / GitLab.
Review code needs 2 systems to agree.
Today they don't, so the hiring decision guesses.
Today they don't, so the hiring decision guesses.
GitLab and GitHub never sync.
To review code you'd merge identify issues with code repositories (github, gitlab) by hand, every single time.
GitLab catches it quietly.
Suggest improvements surfaces in GitLab ahead of time, but that tab is closed during github pr review.
Under The Hood
No exports. Github pr review reads GitHub and GitLab in a single pass. Already connected.
01
Pull review code from GitHub (engineering stack)
Code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab)
02
Pull identify issues from GitLab (engineering stack)
CI/CD
03
output
Agent-ready output
One brief: Review code, identify issues, suggest improvements, check standards, track metrics. Ranked by priority, top risks flagged, a next step on each.
The Context Store
Code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab) from GitHub / GitLab, pre-joined before the agent runs.
Before the prompt runs, the Context Store has matched code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab), CI/CD, Code Analysis Tools, Communication Tools from GitHub / GitLab onto one role record. Github pr review just reads it, no ID-stitching.
Your agent queries one surface instead of three APIs. Faster responses, lower cost per query, and results that work because the relationships were built before you asked the question.
SHARED KEY2 SOURCESONE VIEWLIVE READS
The Prompt
Copy. Paste.
a GitHub PR Review Agent
Two steps. Your data, your results, under 60 seconds.
01install
Connect the Airbyte Agent MCP02copy and run
I want to review code by combining GitHub and GitLab data, then report back.
SETUP
Use the Agent MCP. 2+ connected sources behind one natural-language surface.
WORKFLOW
link GitHub and GitLab, query code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab), CI/CD, Code Analysis Tools, Communication Tools, fold it onto the role, then rank. If a connector is missing, follow the prompt. A one-time browser auth.
TASK
Review code, identify issues, suggest improvements, check standards, track metrics. Deliver a brief I can paste into the hiring decision. Ranked, sourced, one action per item.The Outcome
GitHub PR Review in a single pass. No 2-hour tab marathon. Now your agent can fix it.
10x
Faster
~10x. Github pr review drops from a 2-hour chore to one query.
90%
Cheaper to run
~90% cheaper: zero new infra and no seats added to review code.
2 -> 1
Tools, one query
2 sources, 1 prompt: GitHub and GitLab reconciled before github pr review runs.
Based on internal benchmarks comparing Context Store queries to sequential API calls across equivalent datasets.
01 · Output
Risk-scored output
A 1-10 score on each role means the urgent code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab) rises to the top of github pr review on its own.
02 · Signal
Mismatch alerts
When GitLab and GitHub disagree on review code, the gap is flagged. Not averaged into a guess.
03 · Context
The why, attached
Identify issues from GitLab sits beside each item, letting you review code without switching tabs.
04 · Action
Next action per item
GitHub PR Review closes each role with a recommendation. What to change and who owns it. Ready to run.
05 · Brief
Brief-ready
Hand the brief straight to the hiring decision. Every figure traces back to GitHub and GitLab.
After GitHub PR Review: more people ops agents to build
view All use casesBackground Check Agent
The data for your hiring decision already exists in Ashby / Greenhouse. The problem is no one view joins it. Offer timelines depend on check completion.
Interactive Org Charts
People ops teams run hiring decisions on stale, scattered data: Greenhouse / Ashby each hold a piece, none hold the whole. Organizational changes happen frequently.
Agentic HRIS
The data for your hiring decision already exists in Harvest. The problem is no one view joins it. HR teams manage 50+ employee data points across systems.
Common questions
Didn't find your answer? Please don't hesitate to reach out.
What does GitHub PR Review cost to run?
It rides the 2 connectors you already license. No seats, no glue code, no infra to review code.
Does GitHub PR Review replace GitHub?
No, it reads GitHub and writes back the brief. Your record systems stay put.
How do I trust the hiring decision?
GitHub PR Review cites a source per line. Code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab) from GitHub, the rest from GitLab. So any figure traces back.
How fresh is the role data GitHub PR Review uses?
Live, it reads GitHub at query time, so the brief shows code Repositories (GitHub, GitLab) as of now, not last night.
GitHub PR Review is one prompt away from GitHub / GitLab.
Wire GitHub and GitLab and 47+ sources into the Agent MCP and build github pr review on data you already own.
