Greenhouse only knows its half.
Greenhouse tracks employees, but can't see pay rates. So what you read there is already partial.
The data for your hiring decision already exists in Greenhouse and Ashby. The problem is no one view joins it. Workforce planning tools with current headcount data.
The hiring decision eats the gap.
Greenhouse tracks employees, but can't see pay rates. So what you read there is already partial.
Pay rates lives in Ashby, cut off from employees, so headcount planning guesses at the link.
Ashby sees departments to forecast future hires shift before anyone, yet the hiring decision owner hears about it last.
Under The Hood
Employees
compensation
The plan for the hiring decision: Ingest employee info, pay rates, departments to forecast future hires, riskiest items surfaced and owned.
The Context Store
Greenhouse and Ashby get reconciled up front for headcount planning: employees, compensation, departments, growth plans mapped to a single role view instead of 2 separate APIs.
Your agent queries one surface instead of three APIs. Faster responses, lower cost per query, and results that work because the relationships were built before you asked the question.
The Prompt
Two steps. Your data, your results, under 60 seconds.
I want to ingest employee info by combining Greenhouse and Ashby data, then report back.
SETUP
Airbyte's Agent MCP is connected to 2+ systems; query them directly, no API code.
WORKFLOW
connect Greenhouse and Ashby -> read employees, compensation, departments, growth plans -> merge into one role view -> rank and explain. Each unconnected source is a one-off connect step away.
TASK
Ingest employee info, pay rates, departments to forecast future hires. Return one plan ranked by urgency, top risks called out, a next step on each.The Outcome
10x
10x faster. Headcount planning does in seconds what ate 2 hours of ingest employee info.
90%
90% less spend: no glue code; it runs on your existing 2-tool stack to ingest employee info.
2 -> 1
2 tabs into 1: Greenhouse and Ashby collapse to one view to ingest employee info.
Based on internal benchmarks comparing Context Store queries to sequential API calls across equivalent datasets.
01 · Output
A 1-10 score on each role means the urgent employees rises to the top of headcount planning on its own.
02 · Signal
When your applicant tracker and your applicant tracker disagree on ingest employee info, the gap is flagged. Not averaged into a guess.
03 · Context
Pay rates from Ashby sits beside each item, letting you ingest employee info without switching tabs.
04 · Action
For each role, headcount planning names the next step. The owner and the move. Not just a number.
05 · Brief
The plan arrives meeting-ready: employees first, sources attached, Greenhouse and Ashby reconciled.
People ops teams run hiring decisions on stale, scattered data: Greenhouse / Ashby each hold a piece, none hold the whole. Organizational changes happen frequently.
Your hiring decision is only as fresh as the slowest tab. Manual distribution wastes time. Yet the inputs sit split across Stripe + Shopify + Salesforce.
People ops teams run hiring decisions on stale, scattered data: LinkedIn Ads / Salesforce / Greenhouse each hold a piece, none hold the whole. Top candidates are off market in 10 days.
Didn't find your answer? Please don't hesitate to reach out.
Does Headcount planning replace Greenhouse?
What does Headcount planning cost to run?
How long until Headcount planning is live?
How do I build a headcount planning agent with Greenhouse and Ashby?
Wire Greenhouse and Ashby and 47+ sources into Airbyte's MCP and build headcount planning on data you already own.