An AI agent that works in a demo is easy to build. Making one that stays reliable in production is harder, especially when the underlying data changes constantly.

Batch-processed data works at first because it’s simple. Teams update embeddings on a schedule and assume yesterday’s snapshot is good enough. In production, that assumption breaks. Products change, user behavior shifts, and systems drift faster than batch pipelines can keep up. Real-time data keeps AI aligned with the current state of the business.

This guide explains why freshness matters, where batch pipelines fail, and how to implement real-time data pipelines that production AI systems can trust.

TL;DR

• Batch-processed data works for demos but breaks in production. Products change, user behavior shifts, and systems drift faster than scheduled pipelines can keep up. Stale data causes silent degradation, hallucinations, and cascading failures across multi-agent systems.
  ‍
• Real-time pipelines deliver sub-100ms feature retrieval, eliminate training-serving skew, and capture time-sensitive context that batch systems miss. Fresh data also simplifies debugging because you see the actual state when a decision happened, not a 2 AM snapshot.
  ‍
• Implementation requires five stages: identify which data truly needs real-time access, set up ingestion with Change Data Capture (CDC) or event streams, process data with appropriate windowing strategies, choose storage based on access patterns, and monitor pipeline health continuously.
  ‍
• Airbyte's Agent Engine handles the hard parts of context freshness. It connects SaaS tools and databases, captures changes with incremental syncs and CDC, enforces row-level and user-level permissions, and delivers both structured and unstructured data directly to agents.
  ‍

We’re building the future of agent data infrastructure.

Get access to Airbyte’s Agent Engine.

Join Private Preview →

‍

Why Do AI Systems Fail Without Real-Time Data?

When your AI systems operate on stale data, failures happen in three ways:

• Silent degradation: RAG systems return plausible-sounding answers from stale embeddings without error signals. Users receive outdated information while dashboards show everything running normally.
• Hallucination: AI systems that work with outdated information invent policies, facts, or recommendations that don’t exist, which leads to customer complaints and legal issues.
• Cascading failures in multi-agent systems: Agent A retrieves outdated context, Agent B makes decisions based on stale state, Agent C receives inconsistent inputs, and the final output compounds multiple errors through the system.

Each failure occurs because AI lacks access to current, accurate information.

What Is the Value of Real-Time Data for AI Systems?

Real-time data delivers measurable improvements across your AI systems

Fresh data also matters for explainability and debugging. When your agent makes an unexpected decision, you need to know exactly what context it was working with at that moment. Batch systems show you what the data looked like at 2 AM when the job ran. Real-time systems show you the actual state when the decision happened.

Start building on the GitHub Repo with open-source infrastructure.

How to Implement Real-Time Data for AI?

Implementation breaks down into five stages:

1. Identify and Connect Your Data Sources

Start by mapping which data truly needs to be real time and which can remain batch-based. Not all data benefits from streaming. User demographics that change monthly are fine in batch. Session behavior, inventory levels, pricing changes, and transactions are not.

Most real-time AI systems pull from three types of sources:

• Application events emitted by microservices and streamed through systems like Kafka
• Database changes captured via Change Data Capture (CDC) to reflect inserts, updates, and deletes as they happen
• SaaS application data that requires managed connectors to handle authentication, rate limits, and schema drift

At this stage, the build versus buy decision matters. Building and maintaining custom connectors typically takes months and locks engineering time into ongoing maintenance. Managed connectors can be deployed in weeks and absorb the operational burden of retries, schema evolution, and API changes.

2. Set Up Data Ingestion Pipelines

Data ingestion is responsible for moving changes from source systems into your streaming platform. There are two core ingestion patterns:

• For database changes: Use Change Data Capture (CDC) to stream inserts, updates, and deletes directly from database logs. CDC is often implemented with frameworks like Debezium, or through managed connectors. The key setup steps are enabling the required database logging, selecting the tables you want to capture, and choosing a snapshot strategy to seed historical data before switching to continuous changes.
• For application events: Instrument services to emit events at key state transitions such as user actions, order updates, and inventory changes. Use consistent schemas (commonly Avro or Protocol Buffers) so producers and consumers can evolve without breaking downstream systems.

Both patterns publish into topics/streams that downstream consumers can process with low latency. When you add a new source, ingestion should also support backfills via snapshots or controlled replays so your AI systems don’t lose historical context.

3. Process and Transform Streaming Data

In stream processing, you’re operating on unbounded data that never stops arriving, so you need explicit rules for how events are grouped, timed, and combined. This is where windowing becomes critical to define how you slice a continuous stream into meaningful units. The window type you choose determines which patterns you can detect and which ones you miss.

• Tumbling windows: Create fixed-size, non-overlapping intervals. Each event belongs to exactly one window. These work well for operational metrics like dashboards that refresh every 60 seconds or counters such as “total orders per minute,” where clean boundaries and no overlap matter.
• Hopping windows: They also have a fixed size, but advance in smaller steps, creating overlapping windows. A common example is a 5-minute window that slides every minute. This smooths out spikes at window boundaries and is useful for trend analysis and near-real-time anomaly detection.
• Session windows: Dynamic and based on activity rather than clock time. Events are grouped until a defined period of inactivity occurs (e.g., 30 minutes without user interaction). These are essential when you want to analyze complete user sessions instead of arbitrary time slices.

Once windowing is in place, most streaming pipelines apply a small set of transformations. Common streaming transformations include enrichment joins (joining event data with user profile data to add attributes such as customer tier), filtering (dropping test transactions before feature computation to keep training data clean), and aggregation (counting transactions per user in 5-minute windows for fraud scoring features).

The goal is consistency. Streaming transformations should produce features that reflect current system state, arrive with low latency, and behave the same way every time.

4. Store Data for Real-Time Access

Choose your storage layer based on specific access patterns and scale requirements:

• For vector similarity search at scale (>50M vectors): Use Qdrant (self-hosted) or Pinecone (managed) for 3-10ms P95 latency. Qdrant delivers the fastest performance (3-8ms P95) with strong multi-modal support, while Pinecone offers managed simplicity with 5-10ms P95 latency.
  ‍
• For moderate vector workloads (<50M vectors) with existing PostgreSQL: Add pgvector extension and accept 10-100ms latency. This reduces system complexity by combining relational and vector data in one database and avoids the operational overhead of multiple platforms.
  ‍
• For hot-feature access on every request: Store precomputed, frequently accessed features in a low-latency key-value store (for example, Redis) to enable sub-millisecond retrieval of session data, user preferences, or short-window aggregates used during inference.
  ‍
• For structured metadata and filtering: Use a database setup that supports both relational queries and vector similarity. PostgreSQL can handle filters like "products under $50," while vector search enables similarity queries like "items similar to this image." In many production systems, a single database can support both, so separate systems aren't always necessary.

Match your storage choice to your access pattern, and start simple before adding complexity.

5. Monitor Data Quality and Pipeline Health

Production systems need continuous monitoring to catch issues before they impact agents. Track data freshness (event-time and processing-time latency), completeness (record counts and null values), and accuracy (schema violations and invalid values).

Monitor infrastructure metrics like throughput and resource utilization alongside ML-specific signals such as model accuracy drift and prediction latency.

What Tools Power Real-Time AI Systems?

Real-time AI systems rely on a small number of infrastructure layers that move data, serve it to models and agents, and enforce reliability and governance in production.

Streaming Platforms and Change Data Capture (CDC)

Real-time systems start with continuously updated data. Teams use data integration layers like Airbyte to connect SaaS tools, databases, and files, then stream incremental changes downstream. Platforms such as Apache Kafka handle high-throughput event delivery and inline processing, while Amazon Kinesis offers a managed option for AWS-native stacks. Debezium captures database-level changes and publishes them into streaming backbones for real-time consumption.

Real-Time APIs and Operational Data Stores

Once data is flowing, agents and inference services need fast access paths. Redis provides sub-millisecond access for hot features and session state. PostgreSQL with pgvector supports moderate vector workloads, while purpose-built vector databases like Qdrant scale similarity search to hundreds of millions or billions of embeddings.

Observability, Governance, and Policy Enforcement

Production AI requires visibility beyond traditional uptime metrics. Teams monitor data freshness, distribution shifts, and agent behavior over time. Braintrust supports pre-production agent testing, Openlayer tracks models in production, and Monte Carlo surfaces silent data pipeline failures. Governance platforms such as Credo AI and Knostic add policy, risk, and access controls required for enterprise AI deployments.

What Does Real-Time Data Mean for Production AI?

Real-time data is the difference between an agent that works in a demo and one you can trust in production. When agents reason over stale context, failures show up as silent accuracy loss, hallucinations, and compounding errors across multi-agent systems. Real-time pipelines ensure your AI is operating on the current state of your business.

This is why context engineering matters. Airbyte’s Agent Engine handles the hard parts of keeping agent context fresh and reliable. It connects SaaS tools and databases, captures changes with incremental syncs and Change Data Capture (CDC), enforces row-level and user-level permissions, and deliveres both structured and unstructured data directly to agents. Teams stop maintaining brittle pipelines and focus on agent behavior and retrieval quality.

Talk to us to see how Airbyte Embedded supports real-time, permission-aware data access for production AI agents.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between real-time and batch data processing?

Batch processing updates data on a schedule (hourly or daily), so AI works from snapshots. Real-time processing streams changes as they happen, allowing AI to operate on the current state. Batch is suitable for slow-changing data like demographics, while real-time is required for use cases such as fraud detection and live session behavior.

How long does it take to implement real-time data pipelines?

Teams with existing streaming infrastructure can add CDC and processing within a few weeks. Managed platforms can shorten setup time, while custom connectors take longer depending on complexity. Most teams start with one high-impact data source and expand from there.

What latency do real-time AI systems require?

Many production systems target feature retrieval under 100 ms. Time-sensitive use cases like fraud detection require millisecond responses, while recommendation systems can tolerate higher latency. The right target depends on how quickly decisions must be made.

Do all AI applications need real-time data?

No. Historical analytics and slowly changing attributes work well with batch updates. Real-time data matters when freshness directly affects accuracy or user experience, such as with session behavior, transactions, inventory, or fraud signals.

What are the main costs of real-time data infrastructure?

Engineering time is usually the largest cost, driven by building and maintaining pipelines. Infrastructure includes streaming platforms, storage, and monitoring, but operational overhead often outweighs tooling costs. Managed platforms reduce this burden by handling connectors and reliability.