SQLite vs MySQL: Features, Performance, and Use Cases

•

June 9, 2025

•

20 min read

When designing modern applications, selecting the right relational database management system (RDBMS) is crucial. The long-standing debate of SQLite vs MySQL highlights how architecture, scalability, security features, and concurrency models can impact the trajectory of your project. This article compares the two databases in-depth, covering their structured query language (SQL) support, performance, and real-world use cases, so you can decide which database best fits your data management needs.

Takeaway
MySQL is a scalable, multi-user database management system ideal for enterprise and web applications, while SQLite is a self-contained, serverless database library perfect for embedded and single-user scenarios.

MySQL Overview

MySQL, created by Oracle Corporation, is an open-source relational database that follows a classic server-client architecture. Multiple users can connect—often over a network—to a central MySQL server that processes queries, manages storage engines, and enforces data integrity.

‍

Key Features of MySQL

Multiple Storage Engines – MySQL offers various storage engines like InnoDB, MyISAM, MEMORY, and CSV, which allow administrators to fine-tune performance.
Large Database Support – MySQL is tested for handling hundreds of millions of rows and terabytes of stored data in production environments.
Rich Data-Type Catalog – MySQL supports static typing with types such as CHAR, VARCHAR, TIMESTAMP, ENUM, SET, and high-precision DOUBLE PRECISION.
User Management & Security – It provides granular privileges, role-based access control, SSL/TLS, and data-at-rest encryption.
Horizontal Scaling – MySQL supports replication, clustering, and sharding to help manage multiple concurrent users.

SQLite Overview

SQLite is a lightweight, embedded database engine delivered as a C software library. Unlike MySQL, it lacks a separate server process. The application links directly to the SQLite library, reading or writing to a single file on disk. This self-contained design makes deployment and portability a breeze—simply copy the file, and your entire SQLite database (including data tables, indexes, views, and triggers) moves with it.

‍

SQLite Overview

Key Features of SQLite

Tiny Footprint – The core library is around 250 KB, and the fully featured build is around 750 KB, making it perfect for mobile or IoT devices.
Dynamic Typing & Storage Classes – SQLite columns store whatever type fits the inserted value (e.g., NULL, INTEGER, REAL, TEXT, BLOB).
Serverless Architecture – Unlike MySQL, SQLite has no client-server handshake, reducing latency for local operations.
B-Tree Implementation – Provides efficient indexing and lookups, even in embedded environments.
Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) – An optional journal mode that boosts concurrent reads while writes occur.

Go With MySQL or SQLite. Let Airbyte Move Data Whichever Way.

Try FREE for 14 Days

SQLite vs MySQL: Key Differences

Attribute	MySQL (Client-Server)	SQLite (Serverless)
Data Types	Static, must be declared up-front; wide catalog (VARCHAR, TIMESTAMP, etc.).	Dynamic typing via “storage classes”; the value dictates the type.
Installation Size	≈ 600 MB for a full MySQL server layer with extras.	≈ 250 KB library; single-file database.
Performance Profile	Optimized for complex queries, many concurrent users, and write-heavy workloads.	Blazing fast for local, read-heavy, single-user access; fewer connections allowed for writes.
Ease of Setup	Requires a server process, configuration, and user accounts.	Zero-configuration; drop the single file into your project.
Concurrency Model	Multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) with row-level locking (InnoDB).	Single-writer, multiple-reader; WAL mode improves read/write overlap.
Security Features	Built-in authentication, SSL/TLS, encryption, auditing.	Minimal—relies on file-system permissions or third-party encryption (e.g., SQLCipher).
License	GNU GPL with commercial exceptions; enterprise editions available.	Public domain—no licensing restrictions.
Typical Use Cases	Web applications, OLTP, analytics, SaaS—scenarios that require multiple user access and horizontal scaling.	Mobile apps, browsers, embedded systems—scenarios where a server layer is overkill and portability matters.

In-Depth Comparison

Architecture & Storage Layer

MySQL: MySQL relies on a three-tier client, server, and storage-engine stack. The server processes SQL language requests, coordinates locking, and streams data back to clients over TCP/IP or sockets.
SQLite: SQLite embeds a virtual machine inside the application. Queries compile to bytecode executed in-process, and all data lives in a single file—no separate server process and no network overhead.

Concurrency & Transaction Management

Feature	MySQL (InnoDB)	SQLite (Default/WAL)
Lock Granularity	Row-level locks, MVCC snapshots	File-level locks (default); WAL lets readers continue during writes
Writers	Many concurrent writers	Only one write transaction at a time (serialized)
Isolation Levels	READ UNCOMMITTED → SERIALIZABLE	Snapshot isolation via WAL; otherwise SERIALIZABLE-like
Impact on Performance	Scales to hundreds of concurrent users	Excellent for single-user, moderate for light multi-user read workloads

Security Features

Security Aspect	MySQL Supports	SQLite (Built-In)
Authentication	Users, roles, passwords	None
Access Control	GRANT/REVOKE at column, table, DB level	OS-level file permissions
Encryption in Transit	SSL/TLS	Not native
Encryption at Rest	Tablespace, log encryption	Requires SQLCipher
Auditing & Logging	Pluggable audit log, error/slow query logs	Not native

For projects requiring stringent regulatory compliance (e.g., HIPAA, PCI-DSS), MySQL’s comprehensive security features are likely necessary.

Scalability & Horizontal Growth

MySQL: MySQL supports replication, clustering, and proxy-based sharding. Community tools like Vitess help run MySQL at a Google-scale.‍
SQLite: SQLite is designed to be single-node. Distributed variants (e.g., LiteFS, Turso) are emerging but still in development.

Data Types, Constraints & Integrity

Both MySQL and SQLite support essential relational features like primary keys, foreign keys, and constraints. However, MySQL enforces these constraints more strictly. SQLite, for instance, requires the PRAGMA foreign_keys command to enforce foreign-key constraints, whereas MySQL enforces them by default.

SQLite vs MySQL: Real-World Use Cases

MySQL

Websites & CMS: WordPress, Drupal, and Magento use MySQL for managing content, users, and complex queries.
OLTP: Applications such as banking, ticketing, and e-commerce systems rely on MySQL for ACID compliance and handling concurrent users.
Analytics Backends: MySQL serves as a data warehouse for feeding BI platforms.

SQLite

Mobile Apps: iOS and Android apps, including WhatsApp, use SQLite for offline message storage and settings.
Browsers & Desktop Apps: Firefox stores bookmarks/history, while Adobe Lightroom uses SQLite for catalog management.
Embedded & IoT: SQLite is embedded in devices such as Tesla vehicles for storing logs and smartwatches for settings.

Converting or Syncing Between the Two

Migration between MySQL and SQLite is simple because both support SQL. The process typically involves exporting the data from one database in SQL or XML format, adjusting data types (e.g., changing TEXT to VARCHAR in MySQL), and importing into the new system.

Move Data to MySQL and SQLite Using Airbyte

Airbyte is a modern ELT platform with over 600 pre-built connectors for data extraction and integration.

Feature	MySQL Connector	SQLite Connector (Open Source)
Direction	Source & Destination	Destination
Incremental Sync	Uses binary logging / CDC	Full refresh or append
Setup Notes	Enable binlog; create read-only user	Provide path to the single SQLite file
Best For	Replicating operational DBs to warehouses, analytics	Local dev copies, offline dashboards

Database Management Best Practices

Proper Database Design – Normalize and create clear relational data models.
Index Strategically – Speed up complex queries; monitor for b-tree fragmentation.
Backups & DR – Snapshot single files (SQLite) or use mysqldump/replication (MySQL).
Security Hardening – Enable encryption, enforce least privilege, audit access.
Monitoring & Metrics – Track query latency and lock waits, especially for multi-user environments.

Which Is Better: MySQL or SQLite?

Choosing between SQLite and MySQL depends on the scale and requirements of your application. MySQL excels in scenarios requiring multiple user access, complex queries, and horizontal scaling, while SQLite is ideal for lightweight, embedded, single-user applications.

If you're looking to seamlessly move or integrate data between these two databases, Airbyte makes it easier with its wide range of connectors and automated sync capabilities. Ready to streamline your data pipelines? Sign up for Airbyte for a free trial today and start transforming your data workflows with ease!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can SQLite replace MySQL?

Only for single-user or low-traffic scenarios. SQLite lacks native user management and high-concurrency support.

Do SQLite and MySQL have the same syntax?

Core SQL is similar, but MySQL supports more proprietary extensions, like ENUM and SET, while SQLite uses a simplified dynamic-typing model.

When should I avoid using SQLite?

Avoid SQLite for applications that handle multiple users concurrently, require strict security features, or demand horizontal scaling.

Is it easy to switch from SQLite to MySQL?

Yes—export/import tools and platforms like Airbyte or LiteFS simplify migration. However, mapping dynamic storage classes to static data types is necessary.